I read here carefully on aw's blog "Being a Chinese, something I want to say" and relevant comments. I also recalled many things I experienced since 1950s in last century. I don't want to talk too much on Tibet issue, since many people have got to know some situation there from whatever points of view. I just want to say my idea as follows:
1, Today's China is no longer a sealed country where we generation could only know news from the official propaganda, and got some misunderstanding onto the other country in the world. It is very good now that Chinese people can know the world by their own efforts and then make the private comparing with China and other country. It is just a proof that there could be some foreigners coming to ifgogo to read and comment. But this opening situation has just lasted 30 years. Both Chinese people and the people in other countries need time to know each other well. So, we should be patient.
2, Other countries from the world now can also get more opportunities to come to China to see a real China. So, they say more and more comments on this or that. But I don't think all the western reporters could have stayed in China for quite a long time or have met quite a more local people and talk with them, so that their news might be here or there some misunderstanding on a real and whole China. Based on this assumed idea, I think that we Chinese also need to be patient. However, we never allow those malicious gossip as well as even some attack with evil intention!!
3, It is always true that there is some gap between the people and its government, no matter how badly the government wants to be on behalf of its people or how badly the people trust its government. Why so? It is due to the different position where their points of view come from. I was a common worker when I was 20 and just after 2 years' living in countryside as a "educated youth". Then in 20 years, I became a middle-level leader in the provincial government. I had gone through from root to quite higher lever of the leadership, but I resigned position and quit the rank and turn to a root company again. Why? I got to know there were many things I could not change and could not even do. I'd better to choose a lower but solid job and contribute my love and energy to my motherland. In the last 15 years, I have done a lot of concrete work and feel happy everyday. So, I quite agree with aw that we should firstly do our current job well and devote to the construction of the New China.
4, Patriotism is a good thing, but need to be understood and showed properly. We Chinese should know that China is one of the largest countries of the world with its great population, but it is still being developed and its economical support doesn't match the role it wants playing. So, China also needs time to boom its economy so that to earn more rights on the world matters. I had a long call with my son who went to Canberra from Sydney to join the torch relay in Australia. He was excited at the site with more than 10000 Chinese people there, holding the National Flag, singing the National Anthem. He said just at that moment he could realize why the oversea Chinese looked so crazy at CCTV on the CNY Evening Party. You could not know such patriotic feelings unless you were out of China! Son also told me there was really some people holding Tibet flags and protesting there, but son and other Chinese just simply ignored them and focused on protecting the torch. Son said: "They were minority only, if we paid no attention to them, how could their protest work? We Chinese should be rational patriots. Reality is reality after all! Any Westerner who goes to see the current real Tibet and compare it with the old one, he can get his right answer!" I agree with my son totally!


i'm quite agree with you about the word "patient", then i seems that we have to wait for a long time till we're strong enough to prove the world that we're ready to take on everything.
Thanks for you agreement, but I know you didn't mean that, anyway....lol
What I said "patient" didn't mean to sit there doing nothing currently, but to take an easy mood facing the General Situation. A country's developing takes time and it also takes a long time to let other people in the world to know China well. Look, we Chinese people just have enjoyed the police of reform and opening for 30 years.....
Let me differ a little from Lisa's modest assertion that China still need more time for the world to know it's people and culture and vice-versa.
I believe more has been written about China in recent times than any other major country in the world.The world today is fully aware of China's rise from it's sleeping posture of the past era and are scrambling to become preferred suppliers to meet China's enormous appetite for raw materials as well as finished goods. China has become the darling of the industrialised world, make no mistake about that!
The issue of human rights just happened to be a convenient tool to use to divert attention from the great success of the Chinese people. The US is a leading proponent of this while it is looking the other way when it comes to it's own backyard. I would refer interested readers to the article 'The Hypocrisy and Danger of Anti-China Demonstrations' by Floyd Rudmin at CommonDreams.org
Thanks Ching for your attention!
Anyway, It still needs more time to let China join in the world family. I don't mean She is weather well known by other countries or not but is well accepted by others or not.
However, China is always there standing in the world, no matter others accept Her or not.....
Lee Ching, you're taking yourself too seriously. "The West" has criticized the "human rights" of "communist" countries for decades, long before China began showing signs of impressive economic potential and development. Therefore the "issue" of human rights didn't "just happen" to be a convenient tool to "divert attention from the great success of the Chinese people." Of course, that doesn't mean that the issue of human rights ISN'T currently being exploited by those with an agenda against China but you're trying to dismiss the entire issue using propagandic oversimplification and misdirection.
Also bear in mind that while the United States definitely has blood on its hands, I'm not sure I can think of anything the United States does that the Chinese don't also do. Both are hypocrites anyway.
Kai, it is true "Human right issue" has been utilized against China for a long time. But that doesn't matter since purpose could change. China really has nothing to show off. The Chinese know, the westerners also know. But something must be used to constrain Chinese government since Chinese government isn't western countries' traditional ally, holding a different kind of ideology which diverges from the mainstream of ideology in the western world. Acknowledging that a so called "dictatorship" can run China well is just embarassing and unacceptable. With cold war gone and China developing fast, military blockade and nuclear intimidation can no longer be used in handling China. But "Human Rights" absolutely can.
To make it clear, suppose your girlfriend telling you that a man she met is handsome and suave. You're likely to say "men like that are usually specious, unreliable". It's natural and understandable that when you dislike somebody, you may try to find his faults. This rule also applies in international relationship. Let's continue. Suppose that man is really a dissolute one, will you really care about the ladies who got hurt? I think as long as that man doesn't get to your girlfriend, you won't care. Because you don't even know them, the one you really care is your girlfriend. After Soviet Union falling apart, the average longevity of Russian people decreased almost ten years. Do US really care? So the Russian people got a conclusion: the western country isn't reliable, democracy just doesn't feed you.(民主不能当饭吃)
One direct result of Anti-China propaganda is western people's misunderstanding about China. Amoung westerners' internet comments, 1/6 support Chinese or express their understanding. 1/6 neutral. Amoung the rest of 4/6 comments, believe me or not, 90% of them only come to express their detest or "moral high ground" superiority of feeling because that's not their country. Only a small part of them really, really care about others. The numbers I used aren't really accurate. They are used to make my argument clear.
The United States beats whoever he wants to beat. China fights back only when she got invaded or really really feel threatened. Making up 1/3 of the world's military trading while criticizing a country whose military fund only matches 1/10 of his for her military threat, That's what Chinese don't do and will never do. So who is the hypocrite?
@ Yu Zhiding:
I already stated above that people can use the "human rights issue" for different purposes and different people may have different motives (whether sincere or ulterior). The point is that Lee Ching was still oversimplifying and dismissing the entire issue of human rights as some "plot by the West to keep China down."
For some people, that is exactly what it is. But for many others, it is a sincere AND legitimate complaint against Chinese government policies and actions. Do you disagree?
Now, why are you so preoccupied with "showing off?" I thought being "qianxu" was a Chinese virtue, unlike those arrogant cocky Americans, right? China has much to be proud of. 5000 years of history? The world's next economic super-power? Geez, those two alone puts the vast majority of other countries to shame already. Why the overwhelming insecurity?
Governments and countries have always sought to use various means to promote and protect their interests. China, like all countries, is a victim to this reality of world politics. China, like many other countries, is also a perpetrator. Please don't tell me that you actually believe that China DOESN'T exert its political, military, and economic influence to advance and safeguard its own interests. It DOES, both past, present, AND future. Don't be naive or willfully ignorant.
China using military power? Ask Vietnam, Korea, India, certain African nations. China using political power? Ask Japan, the United States, NATO, and the UN. China using economic power? Definitely ask the United States.
In fact, you should be happy that China is one of the few countries with such power to project. Think of all the smaller, less powerful countries in the world that have much more cause to complain than China. Don't pretend China is some innocent child that gets bullied by all those evil Western countries. That is ridiculous. China will exert its power when it can and when it has cause to do so. It has before, it does today, and it will tomorrow. It may not be as bad as the United States, but you never know how things will change. Good husbands can become bad husbands when they become rich and powerful.
Yes, an autocracy that can successfully develop economically DOES challenge the Western ideal of economic development through democracy. Yes, China's model COULD be a significant and profound paradigm shift in political theory. Just as the United States was the great democratic experiment, maybe China will be the great autocratic experiment. Maybe China CAN show the West (and all of the other undeveloped/developing countries) that there can be an alternative political system that can modernize and develop a country to first-world status. Who knows? So what if they feel threatened? It is natural, just as the imperial dynasties feared change, just as the Nationalists feared the Communists, and just as the Communists fear the West. So what? If you understand why some people in the West are afraid of the Chinese autocratic model competing with the Western democratic model, then why are you upset with them being afraid? It is natural, normal, and understandable. Why? Because we Chinese have our own fears too. We too criticize, fight, and resist many things that challenge our own deeply-held values and preferred world-view. Why CAN'T "the West" be concerned? Why SHOULDN'T the West be concerned for their own interests and beliefs?
In fact, you should be GLAD that our world has moved beyond using the threat of force (military blockaged and nuclear intimidation) against China. You should be GLAD that other countries are trying to appeal to ideology, thought, and values instead of using coercion. You should be GLAD that Western countries like the United States and the EU are not building missles across your border hoping to intimidate China. You should be GLAD that these countries are engaging in political discussion and economic trade to handle China. If China wants to be part of the global community, it is going to have to learn how to play with other countries. The sooner China learns this, the better. Insisting that others never criticize China and only shower China with praise is the behavior of a child. It is time for China to grow up, grow some thicker skin, and be an adult. The world is a tough, competitive place. Get used to it.
Your example of the girlfriend and handsome man doesn't make anything sense nor does it make anything clear. I'm sorry, but feel free to try rewriting it or explaining it further.
Yes, we know that many Western people do not understand or misunderstand China. We also know that many Chinese people do not understand or misunderstand "the West" as well. We know that there is bias in the West. We also know that there is propaganda and bias in China as well. We know that the vast majority Western people are ignorant. We also know that the vast majority of Chinese people are ignorant as well. Do you disagree?
Look, there are many logical and understandable reasons for mutual misunderstanding. The solution is not for Chinese people to continuously whine about Westerners misunderstanding them ("You don't understand me, you don't understand me!"). The solution for increasing mutual understanding is for those of us who DO understand to encourage patience, tolerance, and more communication with and between those who do not understand. Do you disagree?
Yes, both China and the United States are hypocrites. I was specifically referring to the issue of human rights. The United States government has violated human rights when it has professed to champion it. However, so have the Chinese. Have you never read the Chinese constitution? Tell me, how many of the rights "guaranteed" in the Chinese "constitution" are actually "guaranteed?" Few, if any. Even most Chinese acknowledge that the same human rights supposedly promised in both China and the West are better protected in the West. We also understand that the Chinese government have their reasons and arguments for what they do, but that doesn't absolve the Chinese government of being a hypocrite. Again, both are hypocrites. You can criticize the United States if you want, but it won't change the fact that China is still a hypocrite as well. You just need to accept that hypocrisy is universal, especially in global politics.
Overall, I found that the vast majority of your arguments are borne out of cultural projection and a certain misunderstanding of the West.
I wrote a response to this two days ago at the same time as my bottom response but it never showed up. I tried reposting it but the system says it is a duplicate. Is there something wrong with the ifgogo comment system? I'd hate to have to lose and rewrite everything I responded with. :(
Now it’s hard to stop some “intended” organizations from attacking and denigrating China by various means because they treat the rise of China as a big threat to their countries. But in fact, China cherishes the peace of the whole world and respects the sovereignty and territorial integrity of other countries.
Meanwhile, we Chinese have the abilities to deal with all kinds of issues and safeguard our national sovereignty and territorial integrity, tolerating no one to interfere in our internal affairs.
Aspiring for peace, development and cooperation has become the popular will and irresistible tide of the times. It will be proved that such practices as disregarding other’s sovereignty, bullying the small and the weak by dint of one’s size and power and pursuing hegemony and power politics would not get anywhere.
Totally agree with and support you.
Celia, "sovereignty" is an artificial human concept and construct. "Sovereignty" is also to countries as "rights" are to people. They are largely synonymous and in this reality, neither are absolute. In fact, the Chinese should know this better than most. They simply just choose to ignore it.
Some countries, societies, cultures, people value the rights of people over the sovereignty of a nation. Other countries, societies, cultures, and people prefer it the other way. Who is right? Who is wrong? Perhaps both and neither. It is a value-judgement, not an absolute truth.
You are right. Neither sovereignty nor human rights are absolute. But human rights are valued over sovereignty only when the other countries care about a country's people more than its own government. Let's look back to CCP's history. Everything has cause and effect. The cause of CCP's birth and development is just western countries and Japan's savage colonization and invasion. Without these, China may slowly develop into a capitalistic country. It's understandable you will take corresponding kind of action in react of the cause. You get well treated, you treat back well; You got vituperated, generally you quarrel back; You got beaten, you fight back. That's why CCP looked stubborn and hostile in western country's eyes. It's an outcome of extreme historical condition.
Who doesn't want to enjoy a better life? Who doesn't want human rights? Unless Chinese are all idiots. It's not Chinese choose to ignore it, it's because western countries have hurt Chinese enough and Chinese already have a conclusion----western countries aren't reliable. You may say CCP's stubborn, CCP's evil, but CCP has mostly chosen the right ways on big matters on behalf of Chinese. Everyone may make mistake, so will CCP and Mao. But today's different and what matters is that the party knows what it has done was right, what was wrong. With globalization, CCP is willing to make conversation with western countries. China is changing fast, towards the better direction. But western countries choose to be arrogant in front of the amity of Chinese. 150 years after the Opium War, the western countries are still insulting China and Chinese, although in a different and much hypocritical way. Who makes Chinese government stubborn? Who gives Chinese people patriotic education? Western countries.
Men have dignity, so is a country. Money, entertainment aren't all that matters. People in Taiwan may be richer, may have greater freedom, but they have not so much dignity. They couldn't say no to US. And to some extent, they're not free. Achieving "Human rights over sovereignty worldwide" is idealistic. The world has orders, you don't really expect RSF to rule the countries right?
@ Yu Zhiding:
No, the birth of the CCP was also because Mao and the Communists were unsatisfied with the Nationalists and thought they had better ideas for government. The Nationalists themselves were also unhappy with the imperialism of colonial powers (including Japan). In fact, so were the dynastic powers. The difference between them were their political ideologies. Let's not overglorify the CCP, okay?
However, I understand and agree with your argument that the Chinese mentality and reaction has been molded by history. You actually don't need to teach me that whatsoever because nothing I've said requires that explanation. Your explanation further doesn't change any of the facts or points I've stated.
I think you misunderstood what I meant by "they simply choose to ignore it." My point was that China invoking sovereignty is the same thing as people invoking human rights. China says, "this is my country, we are a sovereign country, so everyone else butt out." People say, "we are people, we all have human rights, so everyone should respect these human rights." It is the same argument. China, or the CCP, simply values "sovereignty" and claims it is absolute while ignoring "human rights" and claiming it is not absolute. Other people have the opposite, vice-versa perspective. Again, neither is right, neither is wrong, it is just a value-judgement, a difference of opinion, or at least a judgement of convenience.
I find it really amusing that you think the root of all this evil are Western countries. I'm sorry, but it is childish and short-sighted. Let me ask you, why were these Western countries able to take advantage of China? Why were we Chinese so weak and easy to bully? Was it because we were too busy fighting each other? Was it because we thought our society and culture was so much more superior to those Western barbarians that we didn't bother to learn from them or interact with them? Was it because our belief-systems and Confuscian valued conformity and discouraged independent thought and innovation? We can blame ourselves for letting the West attack us. We had thousands of years of civilized society and we allowed the West to conquer us.
Sooner or later, we have to take responsibility for our own mistakes and short-comings. Blaming the West for our own historical complacency and inability to compete is childish whining. If we're so much better than the West, let's prove it instead of crying about it.
It is always true that there is some gap between the people and its government, no matter how badly the government wants to be on behalf of its people or how badly the people trust its government.
--
If people might decide who could be their governor, candidates will try to minimize the gap. If not, everyone will pay more attention to their own interests instead of the gap, not only those who work in the government.
It is very good now that Chinese people can know the world by their own efforts and then make the private comparing with China and other country.
--
Right. Decades ago, Soviet people could also compare their mother country with NATO, and talk about it in *private* conversation. So far, they still can, while the Soviet has gone. By the way, can they talk about it in *public* now?
Dear IfGoGo community, this is a great discussion here. Thanks for sharing. I was feeling tired and sad thinking about what seems to be an increasing perception gap between Chinese and Westerners and then I just got too tired of thinking about it anymore. What I really want to do is figure out what to do about it.
I talked my boss into allowing me to travel to China and will be:
Beijing - 5/21 evening - approx. 5/27
Shanghai - 5/27 - departing 5/30 morning
I would love to meet up with any of the ifgogo community members or bloggers. I'm especially interested in meeting with Chinese bloggers who are interested in making contact with more foreign bloggers. You can contact me by email: (firstname) at ngventures dot c om. Aw I hope I can meet you!
(Lisa, I think you live in Jinan. I would love to meet up with you but I don't have time to come up to Jinan to see you. :) Maybe someday!)
So I will meet you in Beijing and I will try to ask some other blogger to join the discussion. I will post something at both ifgogo and my personal blog if you want to meet as many bloggers as possible ;)
Oh, you got a visa to the mainland! I've heard that it's hard to get a visa because everybody from the western world is some kind of terrorist suspect now. I knew some guy who has been stayed at Canton for years and couldn't get his visa renewed this year. He needs to go to Hong Kong now, because his visa will expire soon, and he might try to renew his mainland visa after that non-political event.
Thanks a lot, Elliott, for that you could find an opportunity to come to China!
Wish you have a good time in both Beijing and Shanghai!
Hope you have a good meeting with Aw and other ifgogo members!
I will be at a trip in the middle ten-day of May and I am thinking now if I can manage to get to Beijing from Hangzhou directly before your arrival, and then come back soon right after meeting you...
@Lisa
we should firstly do our current job well and devote to the construction of the New China, I quite agree also. So I deside to work for personal company, devote my little
donation to our nationality's corporation.
I think that, in western country, they attach importance to personal contribution, which we do less. If our country's consciousness think much of personal contribution, we can become open and mightiness for industrious tradition of our country's 5000 years civilization.
[...] IfGoGo post and comments on China is now going to the world on 4/25. IfGoGo is a community of Chinese nationals who group blog in [...]
I am now sending my deep sorrow to the dead people in this huge disaster!
I am now giving my best respect to our great China and the heroic people!